Showing posts with label Todd Denault. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Todd Denault. Show all posts

November 8, 2012

Interview With The Author: Todd Denault


I recently had the great opportunity to interview with none other than Todd Denault, author of the bestselling book A Season In Time: Super Mario, Killer, St. Patrick, The Great One and the Unforgettable 1992-93 NHL Season.

This is Todd Denault;s third book release. A Season in Time: Super Mario, Killer, St. Patrick, the Great One, and the Unforgettable 1992-93 NHL Season is a celebration of the twentieth anniversary of one of the greatest seasons in hockey history. And congratulations are in order, as the book as made Chapters' bestsellers list.

Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com 

Here's the full book review. What follows is the interview. I hope you enjoy it.

There are a lot of great seasons in National Hockey League history. Why did you pick the 1992-93 season to relive?
As someone whose childhood coincided with the 1980's, I now look back and feel extremely fortunate to have grown up in that era. To have watched the careers of Wayne Gretzky and Mario Lemieux in their entirety, watched Canada Cups, witnessed the Battles of Alberta and Quebec, and most of all to have lived through that whole high scoring time ... simply put, in my opinion, it was truly hockey's golden age.
In retrospect, the 1992-93 season was the concluding year of that unforgettable era. The 24 NHL teams that season combined for a record 7,311 goals, 14 players cracked the 50 goal barrier, and 21 players reached the 100 point mark. As a means of comparison  in the last season, 2011-12, the now 30 NHL teams combined for 6,545 goals, only 2 players scored 50 goals, and only one managed to tally 100 points. To me, at least, the game just seemed so much more exciting than it is today.
Also, from a historical perspective, 1992-93 was the last season before the game went in a different direction, both on and off the ice. On the ice, the following season, 1993-94 witnessed the onset of the "Dead Puck Era," while off the ice we saw the stirrings of the current labour problems that continue to plague the sport to the present day. Beyond that, it was also a season that saw a lot of endings ... the spring of 1993 saw Wayne Gretzky play in his last Stanley Cup Final, the Montreal Canadiens win the - up until now - their last Stanley Cup, and by extension it was the last championship won by a Canadian based franchise. Add to that a memorable, record breaking regular season, followed by one of the most unpredictable and exciting playoffs in league history and I think that there's a story to be told.
Lemieux's battle against cancer. Gretzky's near-Hollywood perfect ending. The emergence of Eric Lindros. The Leafs renaissance. The Canadiens capture Canada's last Stanley Cup. In your mind, what was the biggest story of the 1993 season?
In many ways the answer to your question depends on your geographical standing. If you're from the Pittsburgh area, obviously Mario is the story of that year, whereas if you're from the province of Ontario then the Leafs are the story of that season, both then and now. Beyond that however, I personally think that when most people reflect back on that season, they immediately think of Montreal winning ten straight overtime games in the playoffs In hockey, there are a lot of unbreakable records, or significant achievements that will never be equalled. What the Canadiens did that spring, I think it's safe to say will never be repeated.

Who was the best player of the 1992-93 season? Lemieux? Gretzky? Roy? Gilmour? Yzerman? Selanne? 
Part of what made 1992-93 so memorable was the sheer amount of significant players enjoying special seasons. As for the best player during that season, I don't think you can answer with anybody else's name other than Mario Lemieux. Now if you asked me which player was the most important to his team that year, than I would answer with Doug Gilmour. And when it comes to the playoffs you can't say anybody but Patrick Roy.

Montreal won the Stanley Cup in 1993, the last Canadian team to do so. That is still a huge mark of pride in Montreal obviously, but can the same be said throughout the rest of Canada?
I'm not sure if it's a mark of pride outside of Montreal but 1993 is a year that sticks out in the minds of hockey fans across Canada, because subsequently every time a Canadian based team has appeared in the Stanley Cup final we are constantly remembered that the 1992-93 Canadiens are the last such team to take home the ultimate prize. That they were that last team stands as an achievement that will remain important and relevant until some other team from Canada skates around holding the Stanley Cup aloft.

How much did Montreal and Toronto's success play in making this "a great season?" Is it possible to have a great season with neither team heavily involved in the Stanley Cup race?
I think the possibility of Montreal and Toronto playing in the Stanley Cup Final played a significant part in making the season a special one, and their dual success that spring definitely helped to make the season much more memorable, both at the time and in the two decades since. With that being said I think that it is possible to have a great season with neither team being heavily involved, but as history has shown it's much harder.

What was the most underrated story of the 1992-93 season?
Clearly, the surprising playoff success of the New York Islanders, a franchise that ironically has yet to win a playoff series since. What the Islanders accomplished that spring - including arguably the greatest playoff upset in recent Stanley Cup history - was completely unforeseen, especially after the incident involving Dale Hunter and Pierre Turgeon in the team's first round playoff conquest of the Washington Capitals. One could make the argument that the 1992-93 Islanders, and not the four Stanley Cup teams, represents Al Arbour's greatest coaching performance.

As you retraced the season in your research, what storyline(s) did you find surprised you in retrospect more than you expected to?
I guess I really wasn't aware of the various "conspiracy stories" that surround the Marty McSorley "illegal stick" incident. Of course, we all know the accepted version of events. But the perspective of some of the Kings players and surrounding staff was quite eye-opening and I thought it was critical to include that in the finished book. Were there shall I say neferious tactics afoot? Did the Canadiens perhaps gain an advantage by taking an advantage of a situation? Is the whole thing just sour grapes? I guess it depends what side of the fence you're sitting on.

In your opinion, how did we go from the high flying 1980s and early 1990s to the Dead Puck Era of 1995 to 2005?
A few reasons. 1) Rapid Expansion - Lacking in talent, many of the teams resorted to defensive systems that while not stylistic were highly effective, witness the success of the 1995-96 Florida Panthers. It soon seemed that more attention started being paid to keeping the puck out of your own net as opposed to putting it in the other team's net. 2) A Golden Age of Goaltending - the very next season saw the emergence of both Martin Brodeur and Dominik Hasek, which along with rapidly expanding equipment helped pave the way for a glut of 1-0 games. Consider that of the top 250 "officially recorded" goalie save percentages  in NHL history, only a single one predates the 1993-94 season. 3) The Lack of Enforcement by NHL Officials - in the rulebook, clutching and grabbing are penalties but when the referee's don't call them ...
Oh, and how I miss the days when a player would come charging down the wing, cross the blueline and unleash a slapshot from just below the red dot that beat the goaltender. I can't remember the last time I saw a player successfully pull that off.

Book related question - What new hockey book released in 2012 are you looking forward to the most?
There's definitely a lot to choose from but without question "Crossing the Line" by Derek Sanderson and Kevin Shea is at the very top of my list. The combination of Sanderson's unique story and the writing expertise of Shea, a person I consider one of Canada's finest hockey writers, is sure to give us all an entertaining, and informative read.

November 2, 2012

A Season In Time by Todd Denault

Todd Denault is back with his third book release. A Season in Time: Super Mario, Killer, St. Patrick, the Great One, and the Unforgettable 1992-93 NHL Season is a celebration of the twentieth anniversary of one of the greatest seasons in hockey history. And congratulations are in order, as the book as made Chapters' bestsellers list.

Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com
Also see: Interview With The Author


For many hockey fans, the mere mention of the 1992-93 season and the playoffs that followed elicit both powerful and still-vivid memories, more so than any other NHL season in recent memory. 

Two decades later that extraordinary season is fondly remembered as the year that Mario Lemieux, the sport's most dominant player, courageously conquered his greatest opponent yet—cancer—and still emerged as the NHL's Most Valuable Player. Not only did he become the best player in hockey, but he transcended his sport with his courageous battle.

Then there was Wayne Gretzky, the greatest player in hockey history, He began the 1992-93 season began on the sidelines, his unparalleled career in doubt with chronic back problems. But he battled back and with all his skills and prowess he took Hollywood on an amazing trip for one last glorious run at the Stanley Cup. 

The next great player arrived to great fanfare and amidst great controversy. Eric Lindros, the undeniable Next One, made many enemies in his time, made quite an impression on and off the ice. Meanwhile Steve Yzerman, Joe Sakic, Teemu Selanne and Pavel Bure represented the next generation brilliantly. 

1992-93 also represented a rebirth of the Toronto Maple Leafs, thanks to a determined Doug Gilmour and coach Pat Burns. The Leafs took their long-suffering fans to the verge of the unthinkable. 

And then there was the Montreal Canadiens. The team of destiny fashioned the most remarkable spring in their incomparable playoff history, on the shoulders of their extraordinary goaltender, Patrick Roy. With an illegal stick and a memorable wink, Montreal captured Canada's last Stanley Cup to date. 

We have come to expect great things from Todd Denault. His trademark extensive research and more than one-hundred interviews expertly chronicles one of the truly landmark seasons in NHL history. It's hard to believe it's already been 20 years since all that happened. Denault brings it all back to life and makes you think it all happened just last week. 


It truly was a remarkable season. And this truly is a remarkable book. 

July 29, 2011

Summer Reading: The Greatest Game

Every summer I escape hockey and the computer by going camping and hiking. The escape from hockey is never far for me. I always carry a few hockey books for evenings of sitting around the camp fire. It is a great way to forget about the daily aches and blisters acquired while chasing waterfalls and mountain tops.

On my most recent outing I found myself staying up far later than I should have. I needed the rest for a full next day of outdoor activity, but I was far too immersed in Todd Denault's The Greatest Game.

Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com - E-Book

The book is about the famous New Year's Eve clash between the Montreal Canadiens and the Soviet Red Army team back in 1975. My favorite parts of the book are the historical build up to the game. Denault explores the rise of the likes of Anatoli Tarasov, Sam Pollock, Ken Dryden and Vladislav Tretiak. It is a must read text for any fan of the Habs or the Soviets.

Denault is as thorough a hockey researcher as you will find, yet he presents his findings with the gift of a storyteller. It is a magnificent book. Here is my original book review.

The book is being released in paperback
in the fall of 2011. As soon as I found out about additional material I will pass it along.

December 28, 2010

The Greatest Game by Todd Denault

It is simply known as "The New Year's Eve Classic." Any good hockey fan knows exactly what game that refers to - the 3-3 tie between the famed Montreal Canadiens and famed Soviet Red Army on December 31st, 1975. So many people also refer to it as the greatest hockey game ever played.

What made this mid-season exhibition game so important? Why has it remained such a touchstone for so many people? What effect did have on the future course of the sport?

That is the focus of Todd Denault's new book  The Greatest Game: The Montreal Canadiens, the Red Army, and the Night That Saved Hockey.

Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com - E-Book

This is Denault's follow up title to his inaugural book/instant classic Jacques Plante: Man Who Changed Face of Hockey. Denault returns with his trademark exhaustive research and presents one of the most important hockey books ever written.

In order to answer the aforementioned questions, Denault first sets the stage for that game.That meant going back a full two decades to 1954 when the awesome strength of Soviet hockey was first introduced to Canada, and the idea of a game between the Soviets best and a NHL team was born.

From there the book tells the parallel story of the Soviet Union in international hockey and of the Montreal Canadiens in the NHL. This is done by using Anatoly Tarasov, the father of Russian hockey, as the conduit for the Soviets and Sam Pollock, arguably the greatest general manager in NHL history, for the Canadiens.

Then the reader is introduced to Vladislav Tretiak and Ken Dryden. It is through these two goalies that story flows. Other players certainly are given the spotlight, but it is the intertwined story of the top two goalies in the world in the 1970s that is the constant throughout the book, especially after both Tarasov and to a lesser extent Pollock fade into the background.

The backstory is long but necessary in order to build up the game so when it finally happens you know it's going to be big. Everything in the backstory leads to that game, brilliantly building a much anticipated crescendo. That's a hard thing to do when writing about an event where we all know the result and happened 35 years ago.

While building that crescendo, Denault's amazing research creates a real gem of a text as he looks at the state of hockey at that time. From Canada's external and internal challenges on the international stage to the deteriorating state of the National Hockey League, where only violence seemed to be escalating.

The New Year's Eve game helps to set the table for the golden age of international hockey competition and the Habs subsequent sweep of the Flyers helps sound the death knell for "the goon age" in hockey. Hence the subtitle of the book ... The Montreal Canadiens, the Red Army, and the Night that Saved Hockey.

This is a great history text that offers so much more than just a look at a single match of hockey. Any historical text that offers a look at Soviet hockey gets big kudos from me. As a big student of Soviet hockey history, I have voraciously read anything I can on the subject, and I can tell you Denault's offering is right up there with Lawrence Martin's The Red Machine as the top text book on the subject. And Denault's look back at the Canadian and professional game is every bit as important.

This is a great book for the hardcore hockey fan on your Christmas shopping list. 

Here's the specs:
  • October 2010
  • Hardcover: 320 pages
  • Publisher: McClelland & Stewart
  • ISBN-10: 077102634X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0771026348
  • Price: $32.99
Here's more from McLelland & Stewart:

"This game wasn't about money, points, or trophies. Instead it was played for pride, both personal and national. It was a confrontation twenty years in the making and it marked a turning point in the history of hockey.

"On December 31, 1975, the Montreal Canadiens, the most successful franchise in the NHL, hosted the touring Central Red Army, the dominant team in the Soviet Union. For three hours millions of people in both Canada and the Soviet Union were glued to their television sets. What transpired that evening was a game that surpassed all the hype and was subsequently referred to as "the greatest game ever played." Held at the height of the Cold War, this remarkable contest transcended sports and took on serious cultural, sociological, and political overtones. And while the final result was a 3-3 tie, no one who saw the game was left disappointed. This exhibition of skill was hockey at its finest, and it set the bar for what was to follow as the sport began its global expansion."
Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com - E-Book
And if you're interested in this title, I also recommend:

November 16, 2010

2010 Paperbacks: Jacques Plante by Todd Denault

A little bit lost in the hype of his new release The Greatest Game, Todd Denault has another book on store shelves in 2010. It is the paperback release of his 2009 smash hit: Jacques Plante: The Man Who Changed the Face of Hockey.

Buy The Paperback: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com

Here's my original review of the hard cover release, although perhaps all you need to know about my thoughts on this book can be read on the back cover of the book:

"After just a few pages into this book it was obvious Todd Denault had written an instant classic. I can not recommend this book enough." 

October 28, 2010

Interview With Todd Denault, Author Of The Greatest Game

Today I have the great opportunity to talk pucks and books with Todd Denault, author of The Greatest Game: The Montreal Canadiens, the Red Army, and the Night That Saved Hockey.

Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com - E-Book

On the surface, this game appears to be a lopsided contest where Montreal was unfortunate not win yet no winner was decided. Why is this game considered by so many to be the greatest game ever played?

There are a few answers to that question.

The December 31, 1975 game between the Montreal Canadiens and the Central Red Army was eagerly anticipated. Keep in mind that the Summit Series was only three years in the past at that point and that this game represented the first encounter between the Russians and the stars of the NHL since that epic encounter. This game was held at a pivotal time in the history of the sport. In fact, Canadian hockey was under siege on two separate fronts. Facing the threat presented by Soviet hockey, there were many in Canada who had begun to question the state of our game. In fact, there were some who boldly pronounced that hockey as practiced by the Soviets represented the way forward. At the same time, the sport, especially in North America, was undergoing a civil war as the emergence of the Philadelphia Flyers saw an increase in both on-ice violence and mayhem that saw size and brawn overtake speed and skill as two of the sport’s most valuable attributes.

I think it’s also important to remember in that Super Series that the Canadiens were the lone team from Canada represented. This obviously placed a higher importance on the game within this country. In speaking to all those involved, including those who watched on television it was an unforgettable event. In fact, the December 31, 1975 game between the Red Army and the Canadiens was the most watched hockey game in Canada since the concluding game of the 1972 Summit Series.

In bestowing the title “the Greatest Game” I think that one has to remember how subjective a title is. Of course, it always makes for a lively discussion and debate which can never have a definitive answer. Yet in the thirty-five years since the game was played this particular game has stood as the standard against which all other games have traditionally been measured, and has remained prominent in our collective hockey consciousness. For example, in the days leading up to this year’s Olympics in Vancouver I read a preview of the upcoming hockey tournament. In discussing the heavy expectations facing the Canadian Men’s Hockey Team, the writer compared it with the pressure that the Canadiens had to endure on the night of December 31, 1975. I think that helps to explain just how important that game was at the time and remains today.

With all due apologies to the Philadelphia Flyers, this was a game between two teams that may have been the most highly skilled in the world, definitely the most successful, if not the outright best, and above all two teams that had never met on the ice. Factor in that the Cold War was at its height and you suddenly have a game that in many ways transcends the sport and creates a whole new level of anticipation. Despite all the hype, the game arguably exceeded all of the expectations. The enthusiasm for the game led to an electric atmosphere that night at the Montreal Forum in which the crowd (both in the Forum and I’m sure for those glued to their television sets at home) endured sixty minutes in which their emotions were laid bare. Watching the game now one can’t help but get a sense of the general nervousness amidst the crowd when the puck was dropped, followed by overwhelming delirium when the Canadiens take the lead, to a throng gripped by fear in the game’s closing moments when the score was tied at three. The pace of the game throughout was extremely fast, whistles were a rarity, and penalties were few. The game was free of the violence that was plaguing the sport at the time, and showcased the sport at its most beautiful.

Even now, the general consensus is that the Canadiens deserved to win as opposed to settling for the tie. There is no doubt that Montreal held a wide territorial advantage over the course of the game and Red Fisher, the dean of all hockey writers, told me that in all of his years covering the Canadiens that on that particular night the team – with the exception of the goaltender – played at the highest level he has ever seen.

Of course, the reason the game ended in a tie was the goaltending. Dryden had a well chronicled off-night whereas Tretiak, in the words of Scotty Bowman “played as good a game in goal as I’ve ever seen.” And there is the crux of what makes this game so special – one of the greatest team’s in hockey history at their very best against one of the greatest goalies at his very best in a one game encounter. On the other side of the ledger you have a Red Army team at it’s most dangerous – over the course of the game the Red Army had one 2-on-1 break and one 3-on-2 break – and they scored on both against a goaltender renowned for his calm and composure who on this one night struggled with both. Despite spending the majority of the game in their own end there is a palpable sense of danger and oncoming dread from both the crowd and the announcers every time the Red Army touched the puck.

The “Greatest Game” was a spectacle that forced you to watch every minute, out of fear that you would miss a moment of the unfolding drama that was being played out on the ice. It was a game of the highest drama and skill that left an indelible mark on the history of hockey.

Ultimately this was an exhibition game in the middle of a long NHL season. How seriously did Montreal's players take this game?

The 1975-76 Montreal Canadiens were a team on a mission that season. It was a trek that began in the pre-season with a pair of exhibition games against the two-time defending Stanley Cup champion Philadelphia Flyers and continued throughout. One of the things that made that particular Montreal team so special was that there was no such thing as an off-night. Each and every game they played represented a test of their greatness.

The game with the Red Army was no different in that respect but obviously a game against the Washington Capitals didn’t have the political, cultural, and social overtones that permeated a game against the Red Army. There were six players on the Canadiens that had also played with Team Canada in 1972 and they, along with the media spotlight, helped to convey to their teammates the importance and uniqueness of this game. For many of the other players this game represented their first and only time playing the Russians. In an interview for the book Murray Wilson told me that he had never felt so patriotic in his career and that for him, this game represented the only time that he represented his country – that on the night the players were not only playing for the Montreal Canadiens, but the province of Quebec, and ultimately, Canada.

Scotty Bowman informed me that he felt the New Year’s Eve game marked a real turning point for the Canadiens. In his opinion, after that game the team felt a whole new level of confidence that they carried with them from that point forward. Some of the players confided to me that in their opinion this particular game made them feel as if they had a special team, even a great team.

Is there one player who really stood out as the star of this game?

Vladislav Tretiak was undoubtedly the first star of the game and it would be hard to pinpoint a game in which he ever played better. His performance has been rightfully regarded as one of the greatest goaltending displays ever seen. Without him the final score may have been eight, maybe even nine-three and then you and I aren’t talking about this book. More than anything it is Tretiak’s performance that helps elevate this game to it’s now legendary status.

The game is simply known as the New Year's Eve classic. Did the fact that it was New Year's Eve add any mystique at the time?

The date of the game certainly brought the contest more attention. Ralph Mellanby, who produced the game for CBC told me that in the days leading up to the game he had a difficult time booking a restaurant for his traditional New Year’s Eve dinner. Calling out to various Montreal establishments he was informed that they were closing on December 31st due to the game. On a whim, he then phoned some of his favourite places in Toronto only to discover the same predicament.

For three hours it seems that everyone in Canada and in the Soviet Union was glued to their television sets. A day or two after the game Mellanby received a phone call from a government friend who informed him that during the three hours the game was on television incidents of crime in the country were down fifty-percent.

Such is the importance of the date that there were three subsequent games held on New Year’s between the Russians and the Canadiens in 1979, 1982, and 1985. And such is the mystique of the game that CBC has now rebroadcast the game a couple of times in recent years on New Year’s Eve night.

The book actually spends a lot of time looking back over the previous 20 years, covering the history of Soviet hockey and comparing that to the NHL and the Montreal Canadiens. Why the lengthy back story?

The road to the New Year’s Eve game begins on March 7, 1954 when the Soviet Union captured its first gold medal at the World Hockey Championships held in Stockholm, Sweden – at the expense of the East York Lyndhursts, who represented Canada. The subsequent outcry throughout the country was comparable to the reaction that followed Canada’s loss in the first game of the Summit Series almost two decades later. Amidst the outrage in 1954, Conn Smythe, then the owner of the Toronto Maple Leafs volunteered to take his team to Moscow “to salvage Canada’s pride.” Of course, this didn’t happen, but it planted the seed of having the Soviets face-off against the best players that Canada had to offer. These players of course resided in the NHL.

In the intervening years the talk of a game between the Russians and the Montreal Canadiens and/or the Toronto Maple Leafs only grew. In the late-sixties Anatoly Tarasov, the Soviet coach openly challenged the Canadiens and/or the Leafs to a game. In the aftermath of the Summit Series, the clamor for a game, especially between the Russians and the Montreal Canadiens only grew more intense.

From my own point of view, I wanted to describe for the reader how these two teams and the players arrived at the evening of December 31, 1975.

Very interestingly, your book uses four vantage points to parallel Soviet hockey and the Montreal Canadiens - the two builders, Anatoly Tarasov and Sam Pollock, and the two goaltenders, Vladislav Tretiak and Ken Dryden. Why did you focus on these four figures?

It is impossible to tell the story of hockey in the Soviet Union without writing about Anatoly Tarasov. Likewise the story of the Montreal Canadiens in this particular period is very closely intertwined with Sam Pollock.

When it comes to the goaltenders, I thought it was interesting to see how two different players, born in two different countries, widely separated by both geography and philosophy, achieved prominence as the two best goaltenders of their time. I also found it interesting how many times Dryden and Tretiak’s path’s crossed before the New Year’s Eve game and how one player’s highs often contrasted with the other’s lowest lows.

For example in the Summit Series, Tretiak’s best games came here in Canada and after the four games he was clearly the star of the series. On the flipside it would be hard to find a player who had been more disappointing than Dryden. In fact, after the fourth game in Vancouver, Dryden thought his on-ice part in the series was over. Of course, as we all know, a resurgent Dryden bested a tired and weakened Tretiak in game six and eight in Moscow as Canada emerged victorious.

After finishing the Jacques Plante biography I had originally wanted to stay away from goaltenders but in the early stages of my newspaper research I stumbled across an exhibition tour that was held in various Canadian cities featuring the Russian National Team against the Canadian National Team. On December 20, 1969 in Vancouver’s Pacific Coliseum the Russian’s defeated the Canadian team 9-3. But what really piqued my interest was when I looked at the box score and scanned down to the goaltenders and saw the names Tretiak and Dryden.

Although they came from very different worlds, were there any common traits between Tarasov and Pollock?

I think that each man was gifted with an extraordinarily fertile mind. Both men were not the type to rest on their laurels or to grow complacent. Each man always seemed to be a step ahead of their contemporaries. Tarasov’s legacy is that he built from the ground up a hockey program that achieved the unthinkable - challenging Canada’s hockey supremacy. Sam Pollock was responsible for assembling what many feel is the greatest team in the history of the NHL. In the end, both men left an unmistakable imprint on the sport of hockey.

Why did Ken Dryden have so much trouble playing the Russians?

There is no doubt that Dryden shouldered much of the blame for the tie against the Red Army on December 31, 1975. In explaining his performance that night I think it’s important to remember just how little he had to do in terms of action. After all, the Red Army does not register a single shot on net in the first ten minutes of a game. As a result of these long periods of inaction I don’t think that Dryden ever got into a comfortable place in that particular game. Keep in mind that the Soviet strategy in those days was to not waste shots, stressing quality over quantity, and as a matter of fact the Red Army was widely outshot in each of the four games they played in the Super Series. Scotty Bowman shared with me that he believes that games like this are the toughest ones for goalies, stressing how difficult it is for the goaltender to keep himself mentally engaged for extended periods of idleness. In this game, I don’t think Dryden was ever able to subjugate his nerves. Perhaps a few early chances or even shots would have had the opposite effect on the usually calmest of all goaltenders. When one watches the tape one can’t help but notice in the final minutes how unnerved he looks on the ice.

Now on the first goal Dryden didn’t have much of a chance. Interestingly enough on the Red Army’s second and third goals he manages to get his glove on the puck, before it trickles through the webbing and barely inches over the goal line. Such is the fine line separating a win from a loss, or in this case a tie.

How many of those 1970’s Soviet stars do you think could have thrived in the NHL had they had the chance to play?

In light of the current success of many Russian players in today’s NHL I don’t think it’s much of a stretch to say that many of those on that Red Army team would have thrived in the NHL of the seventies. In fact I think it’s safe to say that a few of them, including Tretiak, would have been at an elite level in the NHL.

How did this one particular game influence hockey's evolution - in both Russia and Canada - over the following years?

I think this game went a long way towards redeeming hockey in this country. On that unforgettable evening the Canadiens conclusively proved that they were the equal of the Red Army when it came to the twin virtues of skill and speed. Furthermore in the aftermath of this game the Canadiens increasingly came to be seen by many as the team that would save hockey from the clutches of the Philadelphia Flyers, a.k.a. the Broad Street Bullies. Four months later the Canadiens did just that by sweeping the Flyers aside in the 1976 Stanley Cup Finals.

This was a major turning point in the sport’s history, it brought to a sudden end an era where brawn and brutality were starting to eclipse the aforementioned virtues of skill and speed as the prime ingredients for hockey success. From that point forward the Stanley Cup would always be contested by the teams with the most talent, not the most physically intimidating.

In that respect the Canadiens set the template for those who followed and it all began on December 31, 1975. In the thirty-five years since the best teams in hockey have intimidated with their talent and not their fists. Without the Canadiens of the seventies it’s hard to imagine the Edmonton Oilers of the 1980’s, or the Pittsburgh Penguins of the 1990’s having the success they did.

I think the game also set the stage for the avalanche of international hockey exhibitions that followed. Such was the high level of play that evening that hockey fans understandably craved and demanded more of the same.

This game is from another era, from a very foreign world compared to where we are now today. Why does this particular game still resonate with so many people today?

I think for many that games serves as a touchstone in their lives, especially when it comes to hockey. There are very few games where people spend the days, months, and even years after a game discussing the intricacies of what they witnessed. There was a high sense of anticipation, an excitement for that game and it delivered beyond anybody’s expectations. In the thirty-five years since there are very few hockey games that can claim to have done the same. I also think that it’s a tribute to the men who played in the game, Tretiak and Dryden, Guy Lafleur and Valeri Kharlamov, etc… giants of their day who have since passed into legend.

Do Russian hockey fans treat this game with the same historical importance as Canadians do?

As a side note, unlike the first four games of the Summit Series which were broadcast in the Soviet Union on a tape-delay the New Year’s Eve game was the first game held in Canada that was broadcast live. Of all the teams in the NHL the Montreal Canadiens held a certain mystique that the Russian populace identified with before and even more so after this game.

In the course of my research I found an interesting quote from Boris Mikhailov who could still, after all these years, rhyme off the players on the Montreal roster. I think that helps speak to how this game is remembered by those in Russia.

Let me ask the expert - Best of seven series, 1976 Montreal vs. 1976 CSKA Moscow. Stanley Cup on the line. Who wins?

I’m not sure that Tretiak could maintain such a high level of play over the course of a seven-game series. On the flipside I’m also equally skeptical that Dryden could play that poorly over the course of a series. But I think the downfall for the Red Army and the reason I would pick the Canadiens in a best-of-seven series is that on December 31, 1975 the Red Army only played with three lines while the Canadiens consistently rolled four. As a result I think that Montreal would exert their will and talent on the Red Army, eventually wearing them down as a series progressed.

Todd Denault is the author of The Greatest Game: The Montreal Canadiens, the Red Army, and the Night That Saved Hockey.

Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com - E-Book

November 24, 2009

Interview With The Author - Todd Denault

I recently had the opportunity to sit down and chat with author Todd Denault about his fantastic biography called Jacques Plante: Man Who Changed Face of Hockey.

In addition to reading the interview below, you can read my full book review and read an exclusive book excerpt, courtesy of McClelland & Stewart.

What drew you to write a biography on Jacques Plante?

A little over two year's ago, I was watching a hockey game one night on TSN. After the opening introduction, the camera zoomed in on that night's panel and there sitting right in the middle of the commentators was this little, brittle-looking mask.

The host quickly mentioned that this was the 48th anniversary of the night that Jacques Plante first donned the mask and there sitting on the desk was the actual mask. Later that night they discussed Plante and the mask and it occurred to me that I would like to read a book on Plante.

As a long-time fan of the Canadiens I've always been aware of Plante, but what I found when I went looking for the Plante book dismayed me. Here was a goalie who is maybe the most decorated in hockey history and unquestionably the most important and yet there was a dearth of books on the man, especially when compared to his contemporaries. For example, the past twenty year's have brought us three books on Terry Sawchuk, as well as autobiographies by Glenn Hall and Johnny Bower, yet nothing substantial on Plante.

Now keep in mind, that I had always had it in my head to write a book but like most aspiring writers I had always searched in vain for the ideal subject. Now as I was looking into the specifics of Plante's life, the light bulb went off and I began my journey.

Plante of course is known as the man who quite literally changed the face of hockey, by becoming the first to regularly wear a mask. What surprised you the most about his fight to wear the mask?

As I researched that part of the Jacques Plante story, the one thing that struck me the most was how Plante's fellow members of the goaltending fraternity were amongst the majority who condemned his decision.

Plante took a lot of abuse from those in management and in the media at the time but none was more scathing than that heaped upon him by "Gump" Worsley, and to a lesser extant Glenn Hall and Terry Sawchuk. Of course, all of them before they retired took to wearing a mask.

Plante revolutionized hockey. There are very few people you can say that about in any sport. Is Plante the most important innovative figure in hockey? In all of sport?

When we watch a hockey game today, at any level, on any given night, we see Plante's influence on the sport. It's hard to find somebody else in the history of hockey whom we could say the same of.

The closest comparison in baseball might be a Babe Ruth, a player who forever changed the dynamic of his sport for all those who followed.

Goalies are known for their quirks and Plante was no exception. Tell us about his.

Even amongst goalies it would be tough to find one quirkier than Plante. Of course, the most famous of these was his propensity for knitting. And while most people are aware that Plante was a knitter, they don't know the true extant of it. Throughout his life, Plante knitted all of his undergarments, socks, t-shirts, scarfs, mitts, toques, etc...

But beyond the knitting, Plante was a man of routine. Such was the extent of his devotion to his craft, that he only had his skates sharpened once a year - exactly at the halfway point of the season. He even had a specific timetable, which he followed religiously, for his personal grooming habits such as cutting his fingernails and toenails.

Why do you think Plante was such a misunderstood character?

Jacques Plante was the ultimate individual in the ultimate team sport. He was very outspoken and media savvy in an age where most of his contemporaries preferred to let their play do the talking.

He also preferred to keep his own company, avoided spending time in the bar with his teammates, didn't play cards on the long train rides, amongst many other things that differentiated him from his teammates. Jacques Plante was his own man and sometimes that put him at odds with the hockey establishment.

For all their success together, coach Toe Blake was not exactly a big fan of Plante. Why is this?

Toe Blake was the biggest fan of Jacques Plante the goalie. However, Blake found himself often at odds with the man. During the season's in which the Canadiens won five consecutive Stanley Cups their relationship was for the most part harmonious. However, in the three seasons that followed their relationship slowly disintegrated to the point of no return.

Toe Blake was an old-school hockey man and he didn't tolerate distractions and for him Plante eventually became too much of a distraction, hence his trade to the New York Rangers in the summer of 1963.

The research invested into this book is nothing short of amazing. How long did you work on this book?

The research and writing of the book took a little over a year with the last four months being the most intense. From the very start I had set as my goal the finding of anything and everything ever written or said on Jacques Plante. Between that and trying to interview as many people who knew Plante as I could, the whole point was to paint the fullest portrait possible.

Was Plante's family receptive to your biography?

Plante is survived by his oldest son and his second wife, who resides in Switzerland. I made numerous attempts to contact each of them. His widow declined my request as she now does with all media requests and I was never able to make contact with his son.

Hopefully, they will be receptive to the book and the portrayal of their father/husband.

After a life in the NHL, both on and off the ice, Plante relocated to Switzerland. Why Switzerland?

Switzerland was the home of his second wife.

Aside from wanting to begin a life with her in Switzerland I think that Plante enjoyed the atmosphere that the country provided. The climate did wonders for his asthma and he was also able to enjoy a little anonymity. He used to enjoy sitting outside the cafe's of Sierre in the morning, drinking coffee and reading the newspaper. It's hard to imagine him doing the same in Montreal or Quebec City.

He continued to engage with the game in Europe. Is his impact still being felt over there?

I think Jacques Plante's impact is still felt wherever the game of hockey is still played.

Six months after Plante's death, his widow established the Jacques Plante Foundation, the purpose of which is to aid in the development of young, prospective, Swiss goalies. The foundation also has sponsored clinics for minor-league goalies and those less fortunate.

In the Swiss National League the award for the best goaltender is named after Plante.

In 2006 at the Turin Olympics, Switzerland defeated Canada 2-0 in what was the biggest victory in Swiss hockey history. A few days later his widow received a postcard signed by the entire Swiss team.

Who is the greatest goalie in hockey history? Where does Plante rank in your opinion?

I think there is no doubt that Jacques Plante is the most important goalie to ever play the game.

As for the greatest, it would be tough to rank anyone ahead of him.

Seven Vezina trophies, seven times leading the league in goals against, ten appearances in the Stanley Cup finals, six Stanley Cup championships ... all of them tops amongst goalies.

And to top it all off Plante may have had his best year in 1970-71 with the Toronto Maple Leafs. Named to the second All-Star team, finished fifth in voting for the Hart Trophy, he led the league in goals against, and led all goalies with a save percentage of .942 - the highest single season number ever recorded in NHL history.

And all of it accomplished at the age of 42.

November 7, 2009

Jacques Plante: The Man Who Changed The Face Of Hockey by Todd Denault

Folks, I've finally found a true contender for the 2009 Hockey Book of the Year award.

Jacques Plante: The Man Who Changed the Face of Hockey by Todd Denault is worthy of mention in the sentence as Theo Fleury's autobiography Playing With Fire. Stephen Brunt's Gretzky's Tears and Bob McKenzie's Hockey Dad will also get consideration.

Read An Jacques Plante Exclusive Excerpt
Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com

Todd Denault has penned an amazing biography of Jacques Plante, the man I have long considered to be the greatest goalie in hockey history. Moreover, I would easily rank him as the most important and influential goalie, perhaps player of any kind, in the game's long history.

Plante is obviously one of the greatest goalies of all time. The seven time all star won six Stanley Cups, seven Vezina trophies as top goalie and one Hart trophy, a true rarity for a goalie, as league MVP. He still ranks as the 6th winningest goalie in NHL history.

More importantly he was also incredibly influential. Of course you know he popularized the use of the mask. Did you know he also greatly influenced it's evolution. He was also the first goalie to wander the ice to play the puck. He developed communication symbols with his defensemen. Many of the duties goalies do nowadays that we take for granted were started by Plante. Simply put, he is one of the most innovating figures in the history of hockey.

But he was also a great misunderstood character. He was mysterious and complex, and often kept to himself. He was outspoken and defiant, often clashing with a dismissive and narrow-minded hockey establishment.

Denault does an amazing job with this biography, redefining the term exhaustive research in the process. With Plante dead for over 20 years of stomach cancer, Denault was forced to thoroughly investigate newspaper and other printed archives to piece together this jigsaw puzzle. Denault was every bit as meticulous with his craft as Plante was with his.

The result is an amazing biography, although it has a bit of an academic text book feel to it. Denault offers us his years of research, but does not quite take the next step and draws the reader in emotionally from cover to cover, a la Jack Falla.

That's alright, because in between the many facts there are some great stories in here, thanks to interviews with the likes of Jean Beliveau, Henri Richard, Dickie Moore and Scotty Bowman.

My favorite story comes in the book's prologue. Plante insisted that for quite some time the nets in three of NHL's six cities were 2 inches lower than the other three. When the NHL measured the nets, they were shocked to find out the nets in New York, Boston and Chicago were all smaller!

Then there was the many examples of Plante's eccentricities, from his frugalness to his passion for knitting.

As a goaltending coach later in life, how he predicted Patrick Roy would never make it to the NHL. Ironically it was Roy who would take goaltending to the next level of evolution. Plante, who had to fight the establishment to make his progressions, was now the dismissive establishment.

And then there was early death at the age of 57. He was living in Switzerland by that time, and had just been diagnosed with an untreatable and aggressive form of stomach cancer. When his coffin was carried from the church following the funeral mass, it passed under an arch of hockey sticks held high by a team of young hockey players from Quebec, visiting Switzerland for a tournament.

After just a few pages into this book it was obvious Todd Denault had written an instant classic. I can not recommend this book enough. Plante was one of the game's true great players. He is sadly unknown to many of today's generations of fans. He is truly worthy of such a fine commemoration.

October 30, 2009

Exclusive Excerpt From Jacques Plante: The Man Who Changed The Face Of Hockey

The following is an excerpt from Todd Denault's new book Jacques Plante: The Man Who Changed The Face Of Hockey. Thanks to Jessica from McClelland & Stewart for granting permission to run this special.

Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com

THE SEEDS OF THE MAN

By Todd Denault

Located on the Saint-Maurice River, almost halfway between Montreal and Quebec City, at the turn of the century Shawinigan Falls (as it was known then; in 1958, the city dropped the Falls from its name) was a thriving town that was the first in the country to produce aluminum and employed thousands in the pulp and paper, chemical, and textile industries.

In the 1930s, with the onset of the Depression, many of those factory jobs disappeared under the weight of the economic downturn. In an effort to help families hit by the loss of employment, the city council enacted a variety of public works programs that included building a hockey arena.

Bolstered by their new arena, Shawinigan was granted a franchise in the nascent Quebec Senior Hockey League in the fall of 1945. A semi-professional league that operated in the area between the junior league and the National Hockey League, the QSHL, then made up of seven franchises, produced a high quality of hockey that gave many players overlooked by the professionals a chance to continue playing for money while keeping their NHL dreams alive. Overnight, the Cataractes became the toast of the town, a source of civic pride, and gave the youngsters a team of players to idolize.

That same fall, a teenage boy, full of dreams and self-assurance, stood in front of the newly built arena and asked if the Cataractes needed any help.

"I was standing outside the door of the rink in the Shawinigan Arena where the Shawinigan team in the Quebec Senior Hockey League played its home games," remembered Jacques Plante many years later. "I noticed that they had only one practice goalie and asked the trainer whether I could help out. Although I was fifteen years old by this time, he told me to 'go away. You're still wearing a diaper.'"

The name of that condescending trainer has been lost to history. What this trainer had no way of knowing was that in fifty years this young man's name would be emblazoned over the door when the arena was named in his honour.

Jacques, the oldest child of Xavier and Palma Plante, was born in a wooden farmhouse near Mont Carmel in Mauricie, Quebec, on January 17, 1929. Soon afterwards, Xavier moved with his wife and baby to Shawinigan Falls, where he had secured employment with the Aluminum Company of Canada Limited.

"Dad was a machinist who had to work hard – harder than any man I have ever known," Jacques later said. "He even got a temporary job during his holidays while working for the aluminum company – just to raise a bit more money. He had a bicycle to get him to and from work, two miles each way. I can't recall him taking a single day off. Whenever I won an award in the NHL, I thought of my father and the pride he would get in reading about it and having people mention it to him."

Jacques was not an only child for long. Over the next thirteen years, he would be joined by five brothers and five sisters. With a burgeoning family, Palma Plante found her time at a premium, so as they got older each of the children was expected to help with the household chores. Being the oldest in such a large family meant that Jacques was given responsibilities rare for many his age. His chores included scrubbing floors, cooking, and changing diapers. With not much in the way of extra money, most of the children's clothing was handmade, and Jacques became proficient with a needle, some thread, and yarn. These were skills he carried into his adulthood and contributed to his legend.

With such a big brood and only one income, everyone in the Plante house was required to sacrifice some of the things that others better off were able to enjoy. This was most apparent to little Jacques in the hot summer months, when he was allowed to wear shoes only for Sunday Mass or the odd special event. Most times he went barefoot.

"The shoes proved everything is relative," Plante wrote later. "All of us kids in the neighbourhood had to go shoeless for the same reason – all except the landlord's son, because his father had more income."

Years later, when his hockey career had taken him away from his impoverished beginnings, many teammates as well as members of the press were taken aback by Plante's habit of knitting his own undershirts, socks, toques, and scarves. But he would always speak with pride of his ability to knit a pair of socks in a day and a toque in a mere three and a half hours. Throughout his life, Plante used knitting as a form of relaxation, oblivious to the reaction of those around him; this was his way to unwind after being the target of onrushing pucks. However, typical of the man, there was also a practical side to his needlework.

"I can't get what I want in the stores," Plante explained of his choice in undergarments, "so I knit [them]. I use four-ply wool. They must not be too warm. I use larger needles because small ones produce a thicker weaving and the holes are too small."

As an adult, Jacques Plante was misunderstood by many around him. They questioned why he continued to knit, why he was so frugal with his money, and why he kept his distance from those closest to him. The answers to many of these questions lay in his childhood.

"He grew up poor and was very proud of it," explains sportswriter Frank Orr. "He learned a lot of good lessons from it. He was deprived because there was no money around, but it taught Jacques the value of a dollar."

"He was very careful with money," confirms his former teammate Dickie Moore. "He came up poor and he grew up the right way. He didn't spend what he didn't have and he saved what he had. I admired him for that – he was an individual. There's a reason he kept his money. He wanted to end up with something, and that's what he did."

Plante never forgot his impoverished roots. It's what drove him, what motivated him to always reach higher. It instilled in him selfconfidence, and a belief that he alone could shape his destiny. And despite the poverty, Plante always retained a certain fondness for his childhood.

In the early 1970s, when Plante was plying his trade with the Toronto Maple Leafs, Frank Orr, a writer with the Toronto Star, was commissioned by his editor to write a special Christmas column. Orr was given the assignment of asking each player to share a remembrance of their most cherished Christmas memories.

Plante told Orr how his father would buy two bottles of ginger ale on his way home from work every Christmas Eve. This was the only day when the Plante children would taste a carbonated beverage.

"We'd have soft drinks then and I can still taste them," Plante told Orr. "Would you believe that the champagne I have drank on six occasions out of the Stanley Cup didn't have the same tang? Being poor doesn't necessarily mean no enjoyment from life."

Another source of enjoyment for young Jacques was the outdoors. He and his friends played games at every spare moment, whether during recess at school or on the weekends. Sports provided an escape from hard reality.

Baseball was extremely popular with many, and Plante always felt that this may have been the sport he was best at. But for any child growing up in Quebec at that time, all other sports took a back seat to one overriding passion: hockey.

Jacques Plante couldn't tell you when he began playing hockey. He was told by others that he started playing a form of the game, with a ball and without skates, at the age of three, the same age he learned to skate. "Growing up, Shawinigan was a big hockey town," recalls Marcel Pronovost, a childhood friend of Plante's. "We organized and managed a lot of the games ourselves. In all the schools we had an hour and a half for lunch and every class had a team and we played at noon. Every school had an outdoor ice rink then."

Like most children, Jacques was naturally curious about goaltending, but he quickly discovered that a frozen tennis ball hurt, and that a puck hurt even more. Besides, he found that he had an affinity for skating.

And then at the tender age of five, something happened that would forever alter Jacques' path in life. He was climbing up the ladder of the playground slide when suddenly he lost his balance and fell hard to the ground, breaking his left wrist. However, the real damage took place in the ensuing weeks and months when the wrist didn't heal properly, leaving Jacques unable to turn his left palm outward, which made it especially difficult to catch pucks.

Jacques had quickly fallen in love with the game of hockey. He enjoyed skating, but when he skated hard, he had trouble getting his breath. He was soon diagnosed as being asthmatic. Unlike his wrist, which was surgically healed decades later, asthma was a constant companion throughout his life.

"If it wasn't for my asthma," Jacques said later, "I would certainly have remained on defence and possibly never gotten beyond school hockey."

When it became clear that Jacques had no choice but to play in net – where no fast skating was required – his supportive father presented his five-year-old son with his first goal stick, carved from a big tree root. When he was seven, his father bought him a proper goalie stick for Christmas. That same year, Xavier stuffed potato sacks into wooden panels to give Jacques his first set of goalie pads.

It was during these early days spent outdoors that Jacques developed one of his most enduring trademarks. Standing alone in the net in those bitterly cold winters, bare-faced and bare-headed, Jacques soon found himself frantically knitting toques to cover his frostbitten ears. The toque would become a staple and would be worn indoors and outdoors right up until his professional debut.

During this time Plante also discovered that he didn't always fit in with the other children. "Looking back I know it began when my father gave me my first real goaler stick for Christmas," Plante told reporter Andy O'Brien years later. "Although I was only 7 years old that stick got me invited to play with kids 11 and 12 years old. But after we played they didn't want me around. I was left alone off the ice. I didn't resent it because I didn't know any better."

When it came to goaltending and the game of hockey, Plante demonstrated a seriousness about the game not found in many others his age. "For me to be the best possible goalie, I had to learn as much about the game as I could," Plante later explained. "Nobody ever taught me the way to play goal. I was never coached at the position. The skills I developed were learned from personal experience and from studying the mistakes made by other goalies. Of course, hockey is a physical game, and maintaining the best conditioning is important. But playing goal is really a very scientific thing, and that's the approach I tried to take."

Such was Jacques' talent and confidence that at the age of 12, while attending Ecole St. Maurice, he managed to land the goaltending position on the high-school team, which consisted of boys 17 and 18 years of age.

"I still remember the day as if it were yesterday," reflected Plante. "Cold? It was really cruel and the team was practicing on the outdoor rink. What happened between the coach and the goalie wasn't quite clear but the only thing that interested me was the empty net. The goalie had been bawled out, didn't like it and left. I offered to take his place. There was nobody else available. The coach looked around before agreeing with some reluctance to allow a 12-year-old between the posts. But I skated into the net and stayed there – not only that day but for the rest of the season."

Being the goalie on the school team was the first step towards Jacques' ultimate goal: manning the nets for the Montreal Canadiens. Hockey had always been a passion; now he dreamed of making it his livelihood.

"It was the dream of every boy growing up in Quebec in the thirties and forties to one day put on the uniform of the Montreal Canadiens," Plante's future teammate Jean Béliveau wrote later. "I was no different from anyone else who loved playing hockey during that era. We would practice for hours after school in the rink we had in our backyard. By playing outdoors we learned to stickhandle and develop other skills that might one day allow us to play for the Canadiens."

"We couldn't afford a radio," Plante recalled, "but, luckily the man upstairs used to turn up the hockey broadcasts real loud. By standing on the bureau in the girls' room I could hear the broadcasts through the ceiling. In the spring of 1944, when the Canadiens beat the Black Hawks for the Stanley Cup, I listened to those exciting Canadien names coming down through the ceiling – Rocket Richard – Toe Blake – Elmer Lach – Butch Bouchard. When Bill Durnan made a big save in goal, I would try to 'help' him by sticking out a leg or a hand. Believe me, all of those Canadiens seemed to be 10 feet tall!"

Soon afterwards Jacques Plante was so rudely dismissed by a trainer at the entrance of the Shawinigan Arena. This rejection would have shattered a less self-assured 15-year-old, but Jacques, even at this young age, was bursting with confidence. He disregarded the trainer and went straight to the coach of the Cataractes and boldly asked if the team required a practice goalie. Expecting Jacques to fall flat on his face, the coach inserted the boy into a practice of semi-professional players, but was stunned when Jacques not only held his own but shone. Jacques, who had never skated in the Shawinigan Arena before, now found himself the centre of attention. The manager of the arena, in awe of Plante's play, told him that from this point forward he was always welcome at the arena.

Suddenly, at the age of 15, Jacques Plante was in demand. In addition to being the practice goalie for the Senior League Cataractes, he was playing goal in three other age levels simultaneously: midget, juvenile, and junior. "We played together in midget category for Quebec schools," Marcel Pronovost remembers. Plante "was in the nets when we won the Quebec provincial championship."

Unlike many of his classmates, who dropped out of school to chase their hockey dreams, Jacques stayed in school to get the high-school diploma that his parents desperately wanted him to receive. Not that the offers weren't tempting.

The word on Jacques Plante started to spread beyond the local rink and the boundaries of Shawinigan. The wooden benches at the Shawinigan Arena were now filling up with people eager to see the local prodigy, who almost always seemed to be patrolling the goal no matter who was playing. He received an offer to play in England with the pay starting at $80 a week. He was offered a tryout with the Providence Reds of the American Hockey League. His parents stood firm and refused the offers; Jacques Plante had to finish high school first. However, there was one offer he did accept. The local factory team, which played once a week, asked the 15-year-old to join them.

Soon after Jacques started with the factory team, his father pointed out to him that he was in a unique position. All the other players worked at the factory and were paid accordingly. Having watched a few games, Xavier Plante knew that his son was the factor in the team's newfound success, and since he didn't work at the factory, he also was aware that his son was playing for free. Perhaps there was some way that Jacques could be financially compensated? It didn't take long for Jacques to approach the coach, who quickly accepted the weakness of his own bargaining position and capitulated.

"It wasn't my best contract," Plante laughed years later, "but it looked big at the time. I would receive fifty cents a game on the condition that I didn't tell the other players. Fifty cents a week is important money when you're part of a family where soft drinks were only served at Christmas."

Plante may have missed out on his best offer, however. "I grew up in Shawinigan with Marcel Pronovost. We were close friends and played a lot of hockey together. I almost ended up going to Detroit with him. What happened was, a Detroit scout from Quebec City came to Shawinigan to look at four players: Marcel, the Wilson brothers, Johnny and Larry, and me. I wasn't there that night so he signed up the other three and went back home. It was lucky for me that I didn't sign with them. Their regular goalie was Harry Lumley and they had young guys like Terry Sawchuk and Glenn Hall in their system at the time and I might not have gotten a chance to play. I would have disappeared somewhere, especially in Ontario where they had their farm clubs and I didn't speak a word of English. I would have been lost."

And so Jacques Plante stayed behind, and while his friends followed their dream, he continued on with his studies, and graduated from high school at age 18 in the spring of 1947.

He immediately took a job as a factory clerk alongside his father to help the family. But it was apparent to everyone in town that his future lay elsewhere. He had been given a brief taste of semi-professional hockey that year when he played in one game for the Cataractes. Now when he wasn't working at the factory, he was working on what he considered his true profession – goaltending. Spending up to four hours each day in the nets, he kept himself sharp for the opportunity that he was sure would present itself.

Excerpted from Jacques Plante by Todd Denault Copyright © 2009 by Todd Denault. Excerpted by permission of McClelland & Stewart. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

October 29, 2009

New Jacques Plante Book

This weekend marks the release of one of the last big hockey titles this season - Jacques Plante: The Man Who Changed the Face of Hockey by Todd Denault.

Buy The Book: Amazon.ca - Chapters - Amazon.com

I'm still waiting for my copy to arrive. In the meantime, here's an excellent article on the book and it's author. Robert at Eyes On The Prize previously interviewed Todd Denault.